ASTM-B571 › Historical Revision Information
Standard Practice for Qualitative Adhesion Testing of Metallic Coatings
The following bibliographic material is provided to assist you with your purchasing decision:
Scope
1.1 This practice covers simple, qualitative tests for evaluating the adhesion of metallic coatings on various substances.
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Significance and Use
2.1 These tests are useful for production control and for acceptance testing of products.
2.2 Interpreting the results of qualitative methods for determining the adhesion of metallic coatings is often a controversial subject. If more than one test is used, failure to pass any one test is considered unsatisfactory. In many instances, the end use of the coated article or its method of fabrication will suggest the technique that best represents functional requirements. For example, an article that is to be subsequently formed would suggest a draw or a bend test; an article that is to be soldered or otherwise exposed to heat would suggest a heat-quench test. If a part requires baking or heat treating after plating, adhesion tests should be carried out after such posttreatment as well.
2.3 Several of the tests are limited to specific types of coatings, thickness ranges, ductilities, or compositions of the substrate. These limitations are noted generally in the test descriptions and are summarized in Table 1 for certain metallic coatings.
Adhesion Test | Coating MaterialA | |||||||||||
Cadmium | Chromium | Copper | Lead and | Nickel | Nickel and | Palladium | Rhodium | Silver | Tin and | Zinc | Gold | |
Bend | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Burnish | − | + | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | − |
Chisel/knife | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | + |
Draw | − | − | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | − |
File | − | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + |
Grind and | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − |
Heat/quench | − | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | + |
Impact | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | − |
Peel | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | + |
Push | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | − |
Scribe | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Substrate | Coating Material | ||||||
Chromium, | Tin, | Lead, | Zinc, | Gold and | Palladium, | Rhodium, | |
Steel | 250 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 250 | 350 | 185 |
Zinc alloys | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
Copper and | 250 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 250 | 350 | 185 |
Aluminum and | 220 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 220 | 220 | 185 |
2.4 “Perfect” adhesion exists if the bonding between the coating and the substrate is greater than the cohesive strength of either. Such adhesion is usually obtained if good electroplating practices are followed.
2.5 For many purposes, the adhesion test has the objective of detecting any adhesion less than “perfect.” For such a test, one uses any means available to attempt to separate the coating from the substrate. This may be prying, hammering, bending, beating, heating, sawing, grinding, pulling, scribing, chiseling, or a combination of such treatments. If the coating peels, flakes, or lifts from the substrate, the adhesion is less than perfect.
2.6 If evaluation of adhesion is required, it may be desirable to use one or more of the following tests. These tests have varying degrees of severity; and one might serve to distinguish between satisfactory and unsatisfactory adhesion in a specific application. The choice for each situation must be determined.
2.7 When this guideline is used for acceptance inspection, the method or methods to be used must be specified. Because the results of tests in cases of marginal adhesion are subject to interpretation, agreement shall be reached on what is acceptable.
2.8 If the size and shape of the item to be tested precludes use of the designated test, equivalent test panels may be appropriate. If permitted, test panels shall be of the same material and have the same surface finish as the item to be tested and shall be processed through the same preplating, electroplating, and postplating cycle with the parts they represent.
Keywords
adhesion; metallic coatings; ICS Number Code 25.220.40 (Metallic coatings)
To find similar documents by ASTM Volume:
02.05 (Metallic and Inorganic Coatings; Metal Powders and Metal Powder Products)
To find similar documents by classification:
This document comes with our free Notification Service, good for the life of the document.
This document is available in either Paper or PDF format.
Document Number
ASTM-B571-97(2013)
Revision Level
1997 R13 EDITION
Status
Superseded
Modification Type
Reapproval
Publication Date
Dec. 15, 2013
Document Type
Practice
Page Count
4 pages
Committee Number
B08.10