ASTM-B827 Historical Revision Information
Standard Practice for Conducting Mixed Flowing Gas (MFG) Environmental Tests

ASTM-B827 - 2005 R09(E1) EDITION - SUPERSEDED
Show Complete Document History

Document Center Inc. is an authorized dealer of ASTM standards.
The following bibliographic material is provided to assist you with your purchasing decision:

Standard Practice for Conducting Mixed Flowing Gas (MFG) Environmental Tests
ORDER

Scope

1.1 This practice provides procedures for conducting environmental tests involving exposures to controlled quantities of corrosive gas mixtures.

1.2 This practice provides for the required equipment and methods for gas, temperature, and humidity control which enable tests to be conducted in a reproducible manner. Reproducibility is measured through the use of control coupons whose corrosion films are evaluated by mass gain, coulometry, or by various electron and X-ray beam analysis techniques. Reproducibility can also be measured by in situ corrosion rate monitors using electrical resistance or mass/frequency change methods.

1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.

1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to become familiar with all hazards including those identified in the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for this product/material as provided by the manufacturer, to establish appropriate safety and health practices, and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. See 5.1.2.4.

Significance and Use

Mixed flowing gas (MFG) tests are used to simulate or amplify exposure to environmental conditions which electrical contacts or connectors can be expected to experience in various application environments (1, 2).

Test samples which have been exposed to MFG tests have ranged from bare metal surfaces, to electrical connectors, and to complete assemblies.

The specific test conditions are usually chosen so as to simulate, in the test laboratory, the effects of certain representative field environments or environmental severity levels on standard metallic surfaces, such as copper and silver coupons or porous gold platings (1, 2).

Because MFG tests are simulations, both the test conditions and the degradation reactions (chemical reaction rate, composition of reaction products, etc.) may not always resemble those found in the service environment of the product being tested in the MFG test. A guide to the selection of simulation conditions suitable for a variety of environments is found in Guide B 845.

The MFG exposures are generally used in conjunction with procedures which evaluate contact or connector electrical performance such as measurement of electrical contact resistance before and after MFG exposure.

The MFG tests are useful for connector systems whose contact surfaces are plated or clad with gold or other precious metal finishes. For such surfaces, environmentally produced failures are often due to high resistance or intermittences caused by the formation of insulating contamination in the contact region. This contamination, in the form of films and hard particles, is generally the result of pore corrosion and corrosion product migration or tarnish creepage from pores in the precious metal coating and from unplated base metal boundaries, if present.

The MFG exposures can be used to evaluate novel electrical contact metallization for susceptibility to degradation due to environmental exposure to the test corrosive gases.

The MFG exposures can be used to evaluate the shielding capability of connector housings which may act as a barrier to the ingress of corrosive gases.

The MFG exposures can be used to evaluate the susceptibility of other connector materials such as plastic housings to degradation from the test corrosive gases.

The MFG tests are not normally used as porosity tests. For a guide to porosity testing, see Guide B 765.

The MFG tests are generally not applicable where the failure mechanism is other than pollutant gas corrosion such as in tin-coated separable contacts.

Keywords

air velocity; chlorine; corrosion; corrosive gas testing; corrosivity; corrosivity monitor; coulometry; environmental; humidity; hydrogen sulfide; mixed flowing gas; nitrogen oxide; pollutant; pore corrosion; quartz crystal microbalance; resistance monitor; sulfur; sulfur dioxide; tarnish; temperature; testing; Air velocity; Atmospheric corrosion analysis; Chlorine/chlorine-based compounds; Corrosive gas testing; Corrosivity; Corrosivity monitor; Coulometry; Sulfur dioxide (SO2); Environmental corrosion testing; Gases (atmospheric); High exchange (HX) rate chambers; Hydrogen sulfide; Low exchange (LX) rate chambers; Tarnish; Mixed flowing gas (MFG); Nitrogen oxides; Pollutants; Pore corrosion; Resistance monitor (RM); Sulfur--metals/alloys; ICS Number Code 71.100.20 (Gases for industrial application)

To find similar documents by ASTM Volume:

02.04 (Nonferrous Metals--Nickel, Cobalt, Lead, Tin, Zinc, Cadmium, Precious, Reactive, Refractory Metals and Alloys; Materials for Thermostats, Electrical Heating and Resistance Contacts, and Connectors)

To find similar documents by classification:

71.100.20 (Gases for industrial application Including compressed air and hydrogen Hydrogen technologies, see 27.075 Liquefied petroleum gases, see 75.160.30)

This document comes with our free Notification Service, good for the life of the document.

This document is available in either Paper or PDF format.

Document Number

ASTM-B827-05(2009)e1

Revision Level

2005 R09(E1) EDITION

Status

Superseded

Modification Type

Reapproval with Ed Change

Publication Date

Oct. 1, 2009

Document Type

Practice

Page Count

9 pages

Committee Number

B02.11