Document Center is acquired by Nimonik

Scope

1.1 This test method covers the determination of transmissivity from the measurement of force-free (overdamped) response of a well-aquifer system to a sudden change of water level in a well. Force-free response of water level in a well to a sudden change in water level is characterized by recovery to initial water level in an approximate exponential manner with negligible inertial effects.

1.2 The analytical procedure in this test method is used in conjunction with the field procedure in Test Method D4044 for collection of test data.

1.3 Limitations—Slug tests are considered to provide an estimate of transmissivity. Although the assumptions of this test method prescribe a fully penetrating well (a well open through the full thickness of the aquifer), the slug test method is commonly conducted using a partially penetrating well. Such a practice may be acceptable for application under conditions in which the aquifer is stratified and horizontal hydraulic conductivity is much greater than vertical hydraulic conductivity. In such a case the test would be considered to be representative of the average hydraulic conductivity of the portion of the aquifer adjacent to the open interval of the well.

1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.

1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Significance and Use

Assumptions of Solution of Cooper et al (1):

The head change in the control well is instantaneous at time t = 0.

Well is of finite diameter and fully penetrates the aquifer.

Flow in the nonleaky aquifer is radial.

Implications of Assumptions:

The mathematical equations applied ignore inertial effects and assume the water level returns the static level in an approximate exponential manner. The geometric configuration of the well and aquifer are shown in Fig. 1.

Assumptions are applicable to artesian or confined conditions and fully penetrating wells. However, this test method is commonly applied to partially penetrating wells and in unconfined aquifers where it may provide estimates of hydraulic conductivity for the aquifer interval adjacent to the open interval of the well if the horizontal hydraulic conductivity is significantly greater than the vertical hydraulic conductivity.

As pointed out by Cooper et al (1) the determination of storage coefficient by this test method has questionable reliability because of the similar shape of the curves, whereas, the determination of transmissivity is not as sensitive to choosing the correct curve. However, the curve selected should not imply a storage coefficient unrealistically large or small.

FIG. 1 Cross Section Through a Well in Which a Slug of Water is Suddenly Injected

Keywords

aquifers; aquifer tests; control wells; groundwater; hydraulic conductivity; observation wells; storage coefficient storativity; transmissivity; Aquifers; Control wells; Field testing--ground water/aquifers; Ground water; Hydraulic conductivity/transmissivity; Instantaneous head test; Observation wells; Overdamped well-aquifer system; Slug tests; Storativity; Transmissivity and reflectivity; ICS Number Code 13.060.10 (Water of natural resources)

To find similar documents by ASTM Volume:

04.08 (Soil and Rock (I): D420 - D5876)

To find similar documents by classification:

13.060.10 (Water of natural resources)

This document comes with our free Notification Service, good for the life of the document.

This document is available in either Paper or PDF format.